Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dirty Harry cast members

Nowadays, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dirty Harry cast members is a topic that has gained more and more relevance in today's society. For years, it has become a matter of interest to both experts and the general public. Its impact manifests itself in different ways, from the personal to the global level, and has generated debates and reflections on its implications. In this article, we will explore various facets of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dirty Harry cast members and analyze its importance in different contexts, with the aim of offering a complete and enlightening vision of this topic that is so relevant today.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:55, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

List of Dirty Harry cast members (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Featureless unencyclopedic list. WP:INDISCRIMINATE; WP:LISTCRUFT. --woodensuperman 08:58, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 10:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 10:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Dirty Harry maybe "culturally, historically, and aesthetically significant", but this list is not. Presented in its current form it serves no encyclopedic purpose and provides no context for the appearances. This context is provided at Dirty Harry (film series)#Characters (although as there's little crossover for more than three actors, I do question its necessity too), so there's no need for this article which is pretty much useless. --woodensuperman 15:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.