In today's world,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumal people has become a topic of great interest and relevance. It is a topic that has captured the attention of many people and has generated debate in different areas. In this article, we will thoroughly explore
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumal people and its implications in today's society. We will analyze the historical, social, cultural and scientific aspects related to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumal people, with the aim of offering a complete and multifaceted vision on this topic. In addition, we will examine the possible implications and challenges that
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumal people presents in today's world, as well as the opportunities and solutions that may arise from its study. Through this article, it is intended to contribute to the enrichment of knowledge and understanding about
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumal people, and to provide an informative and reflective perspective that invites reflection and dialogue on this topic.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Paradoxsociety 01:42, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Kumal people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I tried to Google around and see if there might be a path to cleaning this up quickly. It doesn't seem like there are enough good sources to make that possible. The only source cited within the article is a Blogspot post. One potential alternative could be merging it into Kumhar if someone else can find sufficient citations as it seems like they may be closely related, but I do not know enough about the subject matter to even understand if that is actually the right home for this content. I have no doubt that the Kumal are a real ethnic group but I think the page needs to be rewritten from the ground up. As it is currently written, it does not fit encyclopedic style. I'd be happy to help with copyediting and style if there is another editor who wants to take up citation-finding and starting a new draft from scratch. But for now I think the existing page should be deleted. Paradoxsociety 07:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Paradoxsociety 07:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Paradoxsociety 07:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Paradoxsociety 07:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- The article could always be trimmed down to a one-sentence stub saying the Kumal are a social group of Nepal, and that there were 121,000 of them at the time of the 2011 census.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Uanfala (talk • contribs) 12:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.