Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Sam

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Sam is a topic that has generated great interest and debate in different areas. Since its emergence, it has been the subject of analysis and study by experts in the field, as well as people interested in understanding its implications and consequences. Over the years, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Sam has evolved and acquired different perspectives, which has enriched the discussion around this topic. In this article, we will analyze in detail the characteristics, impact and possible future scenarios related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Sam, with the aim of providing a comprehensive and updated vision on this topic that has captured the attention of so many people.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:51, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

King Sam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing any real notability. Slatersteven (talk) 12:31, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 13:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 13:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Delete: as above and seems to fufill CSD U5 ‑‑V.S.(C)(T) 04:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.