Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Athanaze

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kpgjhpjm 02:09, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Justin Athanaze (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The one source is basically a mass directory listing bare statistics about people. This is not enough sourcing to establish notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:57, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

• Keep. Very clearly passes WP:CRIN by appearing in 82 matches across the three major formats. It does however need expanding. StickyWicket (talk) 18:32, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
• Keep. First-class, List A and T20 cricketer who passes WP:CRIN. Johnlp (talk) 12:39, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 December 27. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:49, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

• Keep I've added some brief career details / another ref which makes it clear he passes WP:NCRIC. Spike 'em (talk) 14:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
• Keep clearly passes WP:NCRIC.--Binod Basnet (talk) 15:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
• Keep, although it's surprising difficult to find very much written about him. I suspect that it's there in local sources however and in this case the presumption of notability seems valid enough. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:31, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.