In the following article, we will explore
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Patrick (meteorologist) from a deep and detailed perspective, covering all relevant aspects related to this topic. From its history and evolution to its impact on today's society, we will analyze the different points of view and opinions of experts on the subject. Additionally, we will examine case studies and concrete examples to illustrate their importance and relevance today. With updated information and relevant data, this article seeks to provide a complete and enriching vision about
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Patrick (meteorologist), with the purpose of informing and educating our readers about this topic that is so relevant today.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- John Patrick (meteorologist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG A09 (talk) 20:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I was the one who pointed this out on WP:DISCORD and didn't expect to see an AfD nominated because of it. Really important detail: the awards mentioned are regional awards (regional Emmys, Florida AP, etc.) that do not confer notability. This is quite common in broadcast journalism. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- To make things clear, I also saw this article on Discord; however this has no relation to article being unsourced and thus failing WP:BLP. A09 (talk) 20:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Journalism, Television, and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 20:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable enough for a stand alone article. This is local or regional at best and Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Kierzek (talk) 21:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete just a regional weatherman doing his job, nothing found for GNG, beyond forecasts he's made. Trivia section is a red flag and agreed, this is written like a resume. Oaktree b (talk) 21:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Could be summarized as "A guy in Florida has a job" and that's all the notability there seems to be. Jeppiz (talk) 00:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No effective reference and non-notable, man doing his job. scope_creepTalk 09:05, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per above fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:34, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.