Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John James Fox

Today, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John James Fox is a topic that arouses interest in a wide variety of people around the world. Whether because of its influence on society, its relevance in history, or its impact on daily life, this topic has captured the attention of academics, experts, and enthusiasts alike. From its origins to its implications in the present, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John James Fox continues to be the subject of constant debate and analysis. In this article, we will explore in depth the different aspects of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John James Fox, from its origins to its evolution over time, in order to provide a comprehensive look at this fascinating topic.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:46, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

John James Fox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability, unreferenced; looks like it was created by COI editors; ELs old and dead (removed some). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.