Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry O'Flaherty

In this article we are going to talk about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry O'Flaherty, a topic that has become very relevant in recent years/centuries. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry O'Flaherty is a topic that has captured the attention of experts and people of all ages, due to its impact on various aspects of society. Throughout this article, we will thoroughly examine what Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry O'Flaherty is, its importance, evolution over time and its influence in different areas. Additionally, we will explore the different perspectives and opinions that exist about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry O'Flaherty, as well as the challenges and benefits it poses. Without a doubt, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry O'Flaherty is a topic that concerns us all, and it is essential to understand it in its entirety to better understand the world in which we live.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Soft deletion equivalent to an uncontested PROD  · Salvidrim! ·  18:43, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Jerry O'Flaherty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Alleged to be an A7 article, however its in reasonable enough shape that I think an afd better reflects the article's current status. TomStar81 (Talk) 06:16, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:52, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:52, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:31, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.