Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James F. Carberry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

James F. Carberry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was this and this. Pinging interested subject users LaMona, Tokyogirl79 and DGG. SwisterTwister talk 08:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

• delete His Amazon page seems to confirm that he has been a working journalist and writer, but not a notable one.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
• Delete. No evidence for notability. DGG ( talk ) 05:47, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
• Delete Not a lot on any of the search engines. Except for Books, but what was there for the most part had to do with other people of this same name. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.