Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Barth (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

James Barth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches for him in conjunction with him and Twilley or Phil Seymour turn up virtually nothing to support WP:GNG, with the exception of the mention in passing by Dwight Twilley in the source for which I added a citation to the article. His credits at IMDb don't give a clear indication that his occupation has been of encyclopedic significance. Largoplazo (talk) 23:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Note: The previous AFD for a James Barth was for a different James Barth. Largoplazo (talk) 23:42, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:41, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:42, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:42, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.