In today's world,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indroneel Mukherjee is a topic that continues to generate interest and debate. Whether because of its impact on society, its relevance in history, or its influence on popular culture,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indroneel Mukherjee remains a topic of great importance today. Much has been researched and written about
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indroneel Mukherjee over the years, and its relevance has not diminished in the slightest. From its origins to its implications in the modern world,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indroneel Mukherjee continues to be the subject of studies and research in different disciplines. In this article, we will explore different aspects of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indroneel Mukherjee and its importance in today's world.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. treating as if uncontested ProD Tawker (talk) 21:25, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Indroneel Mukherjee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I had a look for sources and what I found is very weak - initially, it looked fine, but what there is seems to be very passing mentions, namechecks in lists, etc. At best, too soon. The most extensive mention is here - and that has nothing to do with fashion design, just that he's a party boy. However, there seems to be just enough out there that a deletion discussion seems appropriate rather than a speedy delete. Mabalu (talk) 00:49, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.