In today's world,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Abdurrahman Farajajé has become a topic of increasing interest to a wide range of people. From experts in the field to those just beginning to explore this topic,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Abdurrahman Farajajé has captured the attention and curiosity of many. Whether due to its relevance in today's society, its impact on daily life or its historical relevance,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Abdurrahman Farajajé is a topic that provokes a variety of opinions and discussions. In this article, we will explore different aspects of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Abdurrahman Farajajé, from its origin and evolution to its future implications. Throughout these pages, we will immerse ourselves in the fascinating world of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Abdurrahman Farajajé, with the aim of providing a comprehensive and enriching vision of this topic that is so relevant today.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 08:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ibrahim Abdurrahman Farajajé (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only source that appears at all credible is the article "Whatever Way Love's Camel Takes: Remembering Baba Ibrahim Farajajé," which reads as more
of a posthumous tribute than anything establishing notability, almost like an obituary (granted it was published a few years after his death, but the sentiment seems similar). All the other sources are either closely affiliated with the subject or do not appear to be generally reputable. An online search seems to return mostly the same things already being used as sources here, with an additional article on Google scholar that again appears to be a simple tribute. This individual certainly led an interesting life, but I see no evidence that they managed to attain notability. Anonymous 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Anonymous 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Bloated bio of a scholar who appears to have made almost no impact. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC).
- weak delete: More than a few journals remembered this individual after their passing, the one given in the article and this one . With a book tribute here , but these all seem to be after this person passed away. I don't see much from when they were still alive. Oaktree b (talk) 02:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Sexuality and gender, Religion, California, New York, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- keep - hang on there is a 2023 festschrift dedicated to him - see, meeting WP:PROF criteria 1c Lajmmoore (talk) 10:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- comment I don't have time right now to work on it further, but these sources might help someone who does here, here (in Spanish), here Lajmmoore (talk) 10:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep anyone who gets a festschrift devoted to them (from non-fringe publications) is notable. Wow this article needs to be rewritten though, lot of NPOV issues PARAKANYAA (talk) 11:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Where are the cites? In GS there are only 9, and we usually expect several thousands. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2024 (UTC).
- comment I've made a start on re-writing the article, and will come back to it Lajmmoore (talk) 19:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kaizenify (talk) 07:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- keep I've now re-written the article, which now has a much more comprehensive range of sources that discuss his work and legacy. The fact he has a festschrift means that he meets WP:PROF criteria 1c. The festschrift is published by Taylor & Francis. Lajmmoore (talk) 20:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Lajmmoore's work shows plenty of references supporting notability and, as she pointed out, a Festschrift is sufficient for academic notability in itself. — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 20:50, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.