Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Money-Coutts, 8th Baron Latymer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn‎. Was not aware that this person was a member of Parliament, which does qualify as an "automatic keep". (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Hugo Money-Coutts, 8th Baron Latymer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear notability. Are all British peers automatically notable? Natg 19 (talk) 04:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Royalty and nobility, United Kingdom, and England. Natg 19 (talk) 04:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Members of national legislatures are usually held to be automatically notable. He was a member of the House of Lords until 1999, even though he never spoke. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• Keep. Yes, members of Parliament are considered notable per WP:POLITICIAN. A profile for him on the official Parliament website can be found here, where is shows him as a member of the House of Lords. --Greens vs. Blacks (talk) 15:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.