Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayley DuMond

In today's world, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayley DuMond has become a topic of great relevance and debate. Interest and attention towards Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayley DuMond has been increasing in recent years, as it has become a central issue in various areas of society. From Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayley DuMond person or historical event, to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayley DuMond theme or concept, this topic has generated great interest and controversy in the academic, political and social spheres. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the impact and importance of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayley DuMond, as well as the different perspectives and opinions that exist around this topic.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 02:28, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Hayley DuMond

Hayley DuMond (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete - there appear not to be reliable sources of which she is the primary subject and her credits are not such that she passes WP:BIO. Otto4711 12:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment - the NYT ref is a filmography with three entries. The same thing can be found for pretty much any actor. It establishes that she exists but not her notability. Otto4711 19:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as apparently failing WP:N. The media coverage I can find is limited to passing references, either in film reviews or in articles mainly about her husband Keith Carradine. WP:BIO allows notability to be demonstrated by "significant roles in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions", but her roles listed at IMDB all seem fairly minor. EALacey 19:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - no real coverage, the NY Times is a filmography and not an actual article about her. -- Whpq 16:59, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia