Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hartford Wanderers RFC

Today we will talk about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hartford Wanderers RFC, a topic that has gained relevance in recent years due to its impact on society. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hartford Wanderers RFC has captured the attention of experts and fans, generating a great debate around its implications and consequences. As we move forward in the digital age, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hartford Wanderers RFC has become a recurring theme in different areas, from technology to social sciences. In this article we will explore the various facets of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hartford Wanderers RFC, analyzing its different perspectives and its influence on our daily lives.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Hartford Wanderers RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local rugby union club, before search brought up no secondary sources to improve/save the article, fails WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 23:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 23:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 23:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.