Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Northern 558

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to EMD SD7. (non-admin closure)  — FR⁺ 04:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Great Northern 558 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

source mainly picture and brief mention. a check on the internet found no significant coverage - WP:SIGCOV Septrillion (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

• Merge I like trains, but I see nothing lending this particular loco notability. TOOSOON, if the restoration provides more coverage. Do we want to redirect to EMD SD7 in the meantime.L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Changed from del/redirect to merge per below consensus. ^{cinco de} L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 19:36, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

• Merge with EMD SD7. Acnetj (talk) 07:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

• Merge into EMD SD7 is a good solution both per our editing policy and our deletion policy. Sam Sailor 18:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.