Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gardens of India

In this article, we will explore Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gardens of India in depth, a topic that has captured the attention of many in recent times. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gardens of India is a complex concept that encompasses a wide range of ideas and perspectives, and its impact can be felt in different areas of society. Throughout this article, we will examine the various facets of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gardens of India, from its origins to its influence on the world today. We will also look at how Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gardens of India has evolved over time and how it has shaped our ways of thinking and acting. Additionally, we will explore the future implications of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gardens of India and how it may impact our society in the years to come. This article offers a detailed and comprehensive look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gardens of India, providing readers with a deeper understanding of this fascinating and relevant topic.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 23:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Gardens of India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In my WP:BEFORE, I tried to find source to push this company over WP:NCORP/WP:GNG and I couldn't find anything that would. The two current sources are press releases. The article was initially draftified, but un-draftified by the creator later, so I am going to AfD for community consensus. Previously there were other sources in the article, but those were removed for not mentioning the company. In failing to pass notability standards, this should be deleted as it does not seem at the current moment, even if this were to be draftified, enough sources could be found for notability, unless I have missed things in BEFORE, which is possible as it is hard to specifically find this company given its somewhat generic name, and hits are given for unrelated things that mention gardens in the nation of India. TartarTorte 18:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

  • Delete per nomination. Their slick website has an "as seen in" footer with press logos, implying secondary coverage in RS, but Google site search turns up press releases and sponsored content from a few of them, and nothing at all from the rest. Might be two IT students flogging tea out of a flat. Wikishovel (talk) 19:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Delete: Non notable company. My search turned up nothing that might be utilized to prove notability. 111.92.123.60 (talk) 18:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Delete: A article on a recent new venture, sourced to press releases around their launch. The given sources fail WP:CORPDEPTH and I am not finding better. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 07:32, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.