In this article, we are going to explore the impact of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiona Lazareff on contemporary society. Since its appearance on the global stage,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiona Lazareff has aroused great interest and has generated countless debates in different areas, such as politics, culture, technology or science. In this sense, we propose to comprehensively analyze how
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiona Lazareff has transformed the way we live, think and relate to the world around us. Throughout these pages, we will examine both the positive aspects and the challenges that
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiona Lazareff presents for our society, with the aim of providing a comprehensive and enriching vision of this phenomenon.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:38, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Fiona Lazareff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Most of the references are about the death of her son. The ones about her are either promotional interviews or notices about an award she founded. DGG ( talk ) 09:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:14, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:14, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:14, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:14, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.Relisting comment: A speedy deletion attempt was contested, so it would be best to get a consensus on this rather than soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 00:32, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - The coverage related to prizes, her litigants in person campaign, and her campaign to make it easier to track relatives abroad is (just) enough to save this article in my view. Particularly, this is a WP:BASIC pass based on at least the following references: 1 2 3. FOARP (talk) 12:47, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.