Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicia (pharmacy) (2nd nomination)

In the world of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicia (pharmacy) (2nd nomination), there has always been great interest and curiosity on the part of society. For centuries, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicia (pharmacy) (2nd nomination) has been a topic of debate and discussion in different areas, whether in politics, science, culture or everyday life. The influence of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicia (pharmacy) (2nd nomination) is undeniable and its impact has been felt in all spheres of human life. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the role of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicia (pharmacy) (2nd nomination) in history and its relevance in the present, analyzing its different aspects and delving into its importance to better understand the world around us.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:30, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Felicia (pharmacy) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: small pharmacy chain. Seems like promo/advert. to me. Quis separabit? 15:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.