Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escuela Parroquial Santa Rita

This article will address the topic of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escuela Parroquial Santa Rita, which has aroused great interest in different areas. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escuela Parroquial Santa Rita has been analyzed from different perspectives, generating various debates and conflicting opinions. Throughout history, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escuela Parroquial Santa Rita has played a relevant role in different contexts, which has led to its in-depth study. Through this article, we aim to offer a global and updated vision of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escuela Parroquial Santa Rita, addressing its origins, evolution and its impact today. Through a detailed and rigorous analysis, we will seek to provide the reader with a more complete understanding of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escuela Parroquial Santa Rita and its relevance in contemporary society.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 14:47, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Escuela Parroquial Santa Rita (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is written like an advert and from what I can tell it has been un-referenced since it's creation in 2006. Except for the one link, which isn't even being used properly and is from a blog anyway. Outside of that all I could find was a couple of trivial name drops school directories. Nothing that was in-depth or would pass the notability guidelines though. Adamant1 (talk) 14:46, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.