In the article that we are going to address next, we will delve into
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliot Myles, a topic that has undoubtedly gained great relevance in recent times.
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliot Myles has long been the subject of study, debate and reflection, and in this article we will explore different perspectives and approaches on this important topic. From its impact on current society to its historical relevance, through its implications in various areas, we will immerse ourselves in a deep and detailed analysis of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliot Myles, with the aim of offering readers a complete and enriching vision of this topic.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Draftify. Consensus to move to draftspace till further improvements. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Elliot Myles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable high school athlete. Citations are two non-independent sources, a database entry, and a BBC article that doesn't mention him. — Moriwen (talk) 16:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- He is a professional that has played for Norwich City's first team and has been on the subs bench in over half of the leagoe fixtures (4of7) this season, hardly high school. BBC article names him on the lineups tab. I will add additional citations. Soccerway stats are very common on wiki for illustrating appearances. Canary757 (talk) 17:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- The Norwich Evening News article is half-decent but not enough to demonstrate WP:SIGCOV. Stats databases like Soccerway are fine for statistics but don't contribute to "significant coverage". Robby.is.on (talk) 18:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Draft This is not the best start for an article and not the best for main space, @Canary757: I strongly suggest you read through WP:DRAFT. Regards. Govvy (talk) 21:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Draftify – Per Govvy. Svartner (talk) 22:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- I've added two new references, but there seems to be a consensus growing. Is it possible to return it to drafts rather than delete it entirely/ Canary757 (talk) 06:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also wiki articles such as Donnell McNeilly and Harrison Murray-Campbell and others of the Chelsea development squad for instance. Are these non-notable too or are they simply presented better?. I appreciate your feedback. Canary757 (talk) 06:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- It is essential to find sources that bring WP:SIGCOV to the player, not just matchmaking databases. Svartner (talk) 07:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thankyou for the advice Svartner. I changed the database references in the main article. Canary757 (talk) 10:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Drafify - not currently notable, but might be in future. GiantSnowman 19:23, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.