Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Spaulding (American executive)

In today's world, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Spaulding (American executive) has become a topic of increasing interest to people of all ages and backgrounds. From its impact on society to its implications on the global economy, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Spaulding (American executive) has generated debate and controversy in various areas. As we delve into this exciting topic, it is crucial to understand its many facets and consider the various perspectives that exist on the matter. In this article, we will explore the different aspects of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Spaulding (American executive), analyzing its influence on the modern world and its potential to shape the future.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Elizabeth Spaulding (American executive) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTINHERIT WP:PROMO and no WP:SIGCOV. May be a case of WP:TOOSOON ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 03:38, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

- Comment. I drafted this article, I think she is a notable CEO and there are many more rs avaible ot link, but I have no attachment to it really. It can be deleted. I kept it short just in case AfD so I do not spend too much time on it. Thanks for review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Singularitywiki (talkcontribs) 21:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

  • Delete This is someone who was CEO for about 18 months during which time the company did well for a short time then tanked. I don't find any in depth articles, just short business announcements. Lamona (talk) 01:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Delete If it remained then every CEO in the world could have their own Wikipedia page based on some online write-ups without a lot of substance combined with a notable event during their tenure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JRed176 (talkcontribs) 18:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.