Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DreamDoll

In this article we are going to delve into the exciting world of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DreamDoll, a topic that has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. From its origins to its impact on today's society, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DreamDoll has been the subject of debate, analysis and reflection. Throughout the next few lines, we will explore its multiple facets, unraveling its mysteries and discovering its possible implications in different areas. Whatever your interest in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DreamDoll, we are sure that this article will provide you with rich insight and new perspectives on this fascinating topic.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 12:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

DreamDoll (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable model/musician who fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:ENTERTAINER, and WP:MUSIC. This is an interesting AfD, as the subject is both an entertainer and a musician. DreamDoll fails WP:NMUSIC as her one single and EP both fail to meet any of the criteria set by WP:MUSICBIO. WP:TOOSOON should also be cited, as the subject's music career began in May 2017. The subject also fails WP:ENTERTAINER, as despite the fact she has made two one-season appearances as a supporting cast member on two different shows, this does not fulfill the unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment or the significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions required by WP:ENTERTAINER. Furthermore, in my multiple attempts () to clean this article I found WP:SIGCOV and WP:VER to both be a constant issue. Some coverage does exist concerning this individual, but none I found went in-depth into the subject, and the vast majority of the information I found was traceable to blogs and other unreliable sources, thus a WP:GNG failure is also likely. In short, the article subject exists but in no way has achieved the notability to be included in an encyclopedia. SamHolt6 (talk) 14:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete - it is WP:Fancruft or promotional material that fails to meet the standards for Notability. SamHolt6 has done a great job to clean it up and remove the worst offending material. What is left is not notable: supporting roles in two minor reality TV series and one unremarkable EP do not make for a notable contribution.--Gronk Oz (talk) 02:55, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:28, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:33, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.