Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hacker (sculptor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Biblioworm 16:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

David Hacker (sculptor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with sourcing issues - unsourced sections, can't easily verify and due to a removed prod without a given reason, just because this needs eyeballs. Widefox; talk 23:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  23:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  23:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

• Delete I prodded this with the reason "Fails WP:ARTIST." I also suspect autobio or a least a close COI. I've looked again and stand by my prod. He's got a few works in a couple galleries: , , he did indeed curate an exhibition in 1986 with passing mentions in the New York Times and New York magazine: , , NYT, New York, and a bizarre passing mention in the National Enquirer . Even with the things mentioned in the article (many of the links are currently broken), none of this adds up to meeting notability for a biography which needs multiple independent reliable third party sources. Valfontis (talk) 16:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
• Delete. no evidence of works in permanent collection of major museum or evidence of substantial critical work on the artist. DGG ( talk ) 09:44, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:33, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it doesn't pass WP:GNG, and they don't appear to meet WP:NARTIST, as pointed out by DGG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.