Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalck Feith

In this article we are going to address the topic of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalck Feith, a topic that has generated interest and debate in contemporary society. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalck Feith has been the object of study, reflection and controversy, and its impact has been felt in various areas, from the personal to the global level. Throughout this article, we will explore the different aspects related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalck Feith, from its origin and evolution to its relevance in today's world. We will also analyze the various opinions and positions that exist around Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalck Feith, as well as the implications it has on people's lives and society in general. Through an interdisciplinary approach, this article seeks to provide a comprehensive and in-depth vision of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalck Feith, with the aim of contributing to the understanding and reflection on this topic that is so relevant today.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 00:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Dalck Feith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Feith was a low-level local businesman. This is just not the level of prominence to justify having an encyclopedia article on someone. John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:43, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E 05:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.