Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Content of a business plan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Content of a business plan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. This completely unsourced article consists entirely of instructing the reader how to construct a business plan, which, in addition to violating WP:NOTHOW, is also impossible to do in a single article. Each business will have unique needs that cannot all be encapsulated in a single article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

• Delete - the article might as well be titled, How to write a business plan. The whole article {{main}}-tags business plan and, as WikiDan61 points out, is only relevant to certain industries/styles of business plan. Stalwart111 22:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

• Delete as flagrant violation of WP:NOTGUIDE. Ansh666 04:25, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
• Strong delete per the above. —Theodore! (talk) (contribs) 04:33, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and WP:NOTGUIDE. Logical Cowboy (talk) 12:12, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.