In this article, we will be exploring the impact of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connie Boochever on our lives and the world around us. Since its emergence until today,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connie Boochever has played a fundamental role in various areas, influencing our decisions, ways of thinking and acting. Over the next few pages, we will take an in-depth look at how
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connie Boochever has shaped our society, transforming industries, promoting social change, and challenging our pre-established perceptions. Through different perspectives and concrete examples, we will discover how
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connie Boochever has left an indelible mark on history and how it continues to shape the future.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nom StarM 02:10, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Connie Boochever (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG, makes no strong claim to notability, no coverage in reliable sources. signed, Rosguilltalk 05:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: I appreciate the discussion and ability to continue editing the page. I added a few more references and the addition of her induction into the Alaska Women's Hall of Fame (although I forgot to sign in when I made those most recent edits - sorry about that!). She was clearly an important figure in Alaska with her dedication to the arts. She was the founder of a number of theaters, was recognized as Juneau Women of the Year and was included as part of Alaska's Women's Hall of Fame. I would think these awards and her contributions would be enough to keep her included in Wikipedia. Jackson Marcus (talk) 07:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: Meets WP:ARTIST#1 "The person is regarded as an important figure..." as shown by her induction to the Alaska Women's Hall of Fame. Thsmi002 (talk) 11:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Withdraw by nominator signed, Rosguilltalk 19:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.