Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concubine Rong, of the Liang clan

Today, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concubine Rong, of the Liang clan is a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide range of audiences. Whether it is a person, an event, a trend or a historical event, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concubine Rong, of the Liang clan has captured the attention of individuals of all ages and backgrounds. This article explores in detail the importance and impact of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concubine Rong, of the Liang clan in today's society, highlighting its implications and influence on various aspects of everyday life. From its origin to its evolution over time, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concubine Rong, of the Liang clan has left a significant mark on the contemporary world, and this article seeks to analyze its relevance in depth.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jiaqing Emperor. ♠PMC(talk) 07:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Creator suggests this article to be moved to draftspace

Concubine Rong, of the Liang clan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge and Redirect to Jiaqing Emperor. WP:NOTEVERYTHING and article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. My WP:BEFORE turned up nothing. Similar article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concubine En was recently redirected.   // Timothy :: talk  04:13, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  04:13, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  04:13, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

*Merge to Concubines of the Jiaqing Emperor. I expect there will be some more information about at least some of these women. The material as it stands isn’t enough to support a series of stand-alone articles but there is enough for a single article with a couple of paras in each of them.Mccapra (talk) 08:44, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.