Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comint consulting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Comint consulting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTPROMO, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Sources used are based on namedrop refs to the CEO, and establish nothing shown in the article besides the name of the company and its CEO. MSJapan (talk) 17:39, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:02, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:59, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete This fails WP:CORPDEPTH by a really wide margin. Hardly any significant coverage in reliable sources. Also the article creator seems to be an undisclosed paid editor. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
• Delete: The given 3rd party reference is a passing mention, and my searches are identifying nothing better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 19:02, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
• SNOW Delete and I frankly consider this G11. SwisterTwister talk 22:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
• Delete -- typical corporate spam with no notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.