In today's world,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold Fusion (novel) (2nd nomination) is a topic of constant debate and interest for a wide spectrum of people. From its impact on society to its relevance in popular culture,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold Fusion (novel) (2nd nomination) has managed to capture the attention of people of all ages, genders and professions. Throughout history,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold Fusion (novel) (2nd nomination) has been the object of study, analysis and discussion, which has led to a greater understanding of its implications and repercussions in different areas. In this article, we will explore the importance of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold Fusion (novel) (2nd nomination) and how it has evolved over time, as well as its influence on the modern world.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) OliveYouBean (talk) 01:17, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
- Cold Fusion (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Having looked at the previous AfD, looked through the sources, and done a WP:BEFORE search, I do not think this article satisfies WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. None of the online sources constitute significant independent coverage, and the offline source I was able to access (AHistory) only contains a two-paragraph plot summary in the context of a timeline of the fictional universe of Doctor Who (weirdly this source doesn't actually support all of the text it purports to support). OliveYouBean (talk) 09:48, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
- I've done some work expanding the article, including adding several citations of various sorts: there's a primary source , and some shorter references , as well as two longer online articles and a review in the magazine Starburst (magazine) of the audio adaptation. I'll try to do some more later. Bondegezou (talk) 11:23, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.