Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chivalric Romance (2000 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Randykitty (talk) 20:28, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Chivalric Romance (2000 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, does not appear to have received notable coverage in English or Russian (WP:GNG). While it was produced at a notable film studio and involved some significant Russian actors such as Sergey Bezrukov and Vasili Lanovoy playing main roles, it does not appear to be considered a significant part of their careers and thus does not satisfy the guidelines at WP:FILM.--RTY9099 (talk) 21:24, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 December 27. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

• Keep Notable film from notable film studios with notable Russian Actors. For a non-english movie this old, sources are hard to find online, but we cannot assume it did not have received notable coverage in Russian at the time without checking in the newspapers from the time period.Emass100 (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.