In this article, we will delve into the fascinating world of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centennial Park (Central Saanich). From its origins to its relevance today, we will explore the most important aspects related to this topic. We will consider its impact on society, its influence in various areas, as well as the challenges and opportunities it presents. Along these lines, we will immerse ourselves in an exhaustive analysis that will allow us to understand the importance and scope of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centennial Park (Central Saanich), offering a complete and updated vision of this topic that is so relevant today.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:04, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Centennial Park (Central Saanich) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a park in a small town, referenced only to its own primary source facilities profile on the town government's own self-published website. As always, every park that exists in every town or city is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because it exists -- it needs to be referenced to a WP:GNG-satisfying volume of reliable source coverage in media or books, but nothing like that is being shown here at all. Bearcat (talk) 22:13, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:55, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:24, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:16, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete there are other non-primary sources. Sources like (the park has a feces problem) and (the park has a cenotaph). Unfortunately for this article, they're hyper-local and routine, and I can't find any other sources which aren't. SportingFlyer talk 04:06, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.