Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruna Caram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Bruna Caram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Surely questionably notable and improvable as there's hardly much so this is even speedy and PROD material with my searches also finding nothing better than this and this. Pinging past user Blanchardb and also interested subject users Michig, Victor Lopes and Walter Görlitz. SwisterTwister talk 08:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

• Comment: Got a couple of relevant sources: and . Both are about her debut as an actress. Don't know if it'll help much. Victão Lopes ^Fala! 00:25, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
• Keep I found so mcuh good content (in Brazilian Portuguese) in the first ten hits in the linked Google source, I can't imagine how anyone could nominate otherwise. Improve the article (and the one on the Portuguese project). Sorry. It was the news search. The regular one doesn't have as many good hits. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
• Keep. Yes, quite obviously notable from GNews results. --Michig (talk) 09:00, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
• Keep Clearly just a poorly structured ptwiki article that needs to have citations and links improved to conform better with enwiki standards. giso6150 (talk) 20:11, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.