Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Allpress

In this article, we are going to dive into the exciting world of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Allpress. We will learn about its history, its applications and its relevance in contemporary society. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Allpress has been the subject of debate and study over the years, and it is important to understand its impact in different areas, from technology to culture. Through this article, we will explore the various aspects of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Allpress and unravel its complexities to provide a complete and insightful look at this fascinating topic.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 15:23, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Bruce Allpress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was delete via PROD in 2017, citing his lack of significant roles or reliable coverage, then restored in 2020 after his death. That alone does not merit notability per WP:NOTMEMORIAL and he did not really get much coverage from it anyway. He had no major roles from the time the article was first deleted until his death and the awards he won do not seem to meet notability requirements for actors. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 13:54, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.