Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broken Script

In today's world, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broken Script is a topic that has gained great relevance and has captured the attention of a wide audience. Whether due to its impact on society, its relevance in the professional field or its influence on popular culture, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broken Script has become a fundamental aspect in the current panorama. In this article, we will thoroughly explore all facets of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broken Script, from its origin to its evolution today, offering a comprehensive perspective that allows us to understand its importance and scope in different contexts.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:31, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Broken Script (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely no notability for this 2023 film production written, produced and starring the same redlinked person. A small number of poor reviews in local media do not get us past criteria 1 of WP:NFILM, "The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics." while it simultaneously fails all other criteria with gusto. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.