In this article we are going to explore in detail the topic of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandie Knight, an issue that has captured the attention of many people today.
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandie Knight has been the subject of numerous debates and studies in recent years, and its relevance and impact on different aspects of society have not gone unnoticed. From its origin to its future implications,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandie Knight has become a topic of general interest that affects people of all types, regardless of age, gender or geographic location. Throughout this article, we will take a look at the various aspects related to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandie Knight, addressing its many facets and how it has evolved over time.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Brandie Knight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A surprisingly long-lived vanity article for a writer (and television executive?) whose main claim to fame seems to be obscure self-published works (see for instance Hollywood under the Covers, published by "Vegas Revolutions, LLC", a defunct company headed by none other than... Brandie Knight, or, amusingly, Self-Publish Like a Pro), and a tangential link to Tommy Chong.
All the existing references belong to blogs and recondite trade publications or fall under WP:PRSOURCE, and the claims of working on various Hollywood projects are totally unsourced. She has received no independent coverage and fails WP:AUTHOR by every possible metric. MasqueDesRonces (talk) 11:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete spam ant not notable. Oaktree b (talk) 12:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I should add that the article's creator, VegasRev, is responsible for the overwhelming majority of the article's content and has exclusively made edits related to Brandie Knight, including several unsourced quotes from Ms. Knight, so WP:COI can reasonably be assumed. --MasqueDesRonces (talk) 13:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, and Oklahoma. Shellwood (talk) 15:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Potential COI aside, the subject is not notable and the article makes no support for inclusion in Wikipedia. IrishOsita (talk) 03:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.