Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlueNC

In this article, we will delve into the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlueNC, exploring its multiple facets and its impact on different aspects of today's society. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlueNC has been an object of study and interest for many years, both for its historical relevance and for its influence in the contemporary world. Throughout the next lines, we will analyze in depth the different aspects that make Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlueNC a topic of debate and reflection, as well as its relevance in different contexts and scenarios. From its impact on the economy to its influence on popular culture, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlueNC has left a profound mark on people's lives, and it is essential to understand its importance in order to better understand the world around us.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

BlueNC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a non-notable, seemingly long-defunct website, originally created by the editor of the site. Only one of the external links is actually still active, and it would not be considered significant coverage in a reliable source. Searches turned up no additional coverage on the website, making it a failure of the WP:GNG and WP:NWEB. The article was WP:PRODed shortly after its creation in 2006, but that was contested by the article creator, so I am bringing it to AFD now. Rorshacma (talk) 21:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.