Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhanu Dhamija

In today's world, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhanu Dhamija has acquired significant relevance in different areas, generating an impact that goes beyond what was expected. Since its emergence, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhanu Dhamija has captured the attention of experts and the general public, generating debates, research and diverse opinions that have marked its importance and scope in contemporary society. In this article, we will delve into the essence of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhanu Dhamija, exploring its implications, its evolution over time, and its influence in different spheres, demonstrating the impact that this unique figure/theme/date has on our current reality.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Bhanu Dhamija

Bhanu Dhamija (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and thus, too soon to get an entry in the encyclopedia. Dial911 (talk) 08:28, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:41, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:41, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:41, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:41, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete no coverage in reliable sources. Listed references are not independent and a quick search returns only self-published sources. The claim about the largest media company also appears to be false.  samee  converse  08:18, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia