Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betcha (band) (2nd nomination)

In this article, the topic of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betcha (band) (2nd nomination) will be addressed, which has sparked great interest and debate in different areas. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betcha (band) (2nd nomination) is a topic that has captured the attention of academics, specialists, and the general public due to its relevance in today's society. From its origins to the present, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betcha (band) (2nd nomination) has been the object of study, analysis and reflection, which has led to the generation of different theories, approaches and opinions on the matter. Throughout this article, the most relevant aspects of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betcha (band) (2nd nomination) will be explored, as well as its impact on various aspects of daily life. Likewise, the different perspectives that exist around Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betcha (band) (2nd nomination) will be examined, with the aim of offering a broad and comprehensive vision of the topic.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:21, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Betcha (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Soft delete reversed via WP:RFU in order to relist at AFD. UtherSRG (talk) 16:45, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Please note this editor has been blocked as a sockpuppet. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: relisting since the page is ineligible for soft deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 17:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Delete: One tenet of NBAND alone is not enough to keep this, and it does not appear they pass any others. QuietHere (talk) 23:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.