In this article we are going to delve into the fascinating world of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beanpole (TV pilot). Whether you are interested in learning more about this person, exploring this topic in depth, or discovering the most relevant events related to this date, this article will provide you with all the information you need. From its origins to its relevance today, we will immerse ourselves in a journey that will allow us to thoroughly understand
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beanpole (TV pilot) and its impact on different aspects of daily life. No matter what your interest is, this article will give you all the information you need to delve into the world of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beanpole (TV pilot).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:11, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Beanpole (TV pilot) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable pilot; lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. References only contain mentions of pilot; no significant coverage to warrant standalone article. -- Wikipedical (talk) 23:32, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 23:41, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 23:41, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Incredibly non-notable pilot only used to literally fill time on a July 4. Nate • (chatter) 01:52, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, nn. Szzuk (talk) 18:20, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedical, would you please explain why you didn't bother to notify me of this AfD or the prod? I didn't even realize the article was gone until a bot notified me that the logo wasn't used in any articles. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 02:56, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. TV pilots aren't automatically entitled to articles just because they existed, or even just because they went to air as one-off specials. Per WP:TVSHOW, a pilot can qualify for an article on that latter basis if it can be well-sourced over WP:GNG as having gotten substantive media and/or award attention, but getting a pilot over that bar requires quite a bit more than just being able to provide technical verification that it existed — for example, Gavin Crawford's Wild West was a failed pilot that aired as a one-off special and got Canadian Screen Award nominations out of it, and thus got a Wikipedia article because of the award nominations rather than just because it existed. Bearcat (talk) 21:23, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. ShunDream (talk) 20:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete since subject fails WP:NTV. Some people get upset when stuff like this is deleted from Wikipedia. They demand that the info be here for whomever might look for it. But Wikipedia is not the place to look for everything on cinema and TV. It's an encyclopaedia; not a TV almanac. -The Gnome (talk) 14:37, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Dial911 (talk) 17:51, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.