Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Associate mobile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:16, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Associate mobile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company fails WP:GNG. I was unable to find anything to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. I added a reference from Bloomberg to the article but that is just a listing verifying that the company exists. CNMall41 (talk) 21:09, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete The subject lacks notability.TH1980 (talk) 22:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

• Delete - no coverage other than business directories, etc. Does not meet basic notability standards.Glendoremus (talk) 05:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG, I could not find significant coverage of the company in any independent reliable source, just listings in business directories. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:54, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.