Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjada Gandu (2014 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 12:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Anjada Gandu (2014 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication at all of notability; article is without references. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:51, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:00, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:00, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

and through WP:INDAFD: Anjada Gandu

• Keep released film with reviews. Sad that the author created it without sources, but they ARE available and that shows a meeting of WP:NF. I very quickly found Times of India Banmgalore Mirror Perhaps the nominator might take a look at WP:NRVE and withdraw? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 00:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

• Update: As reported to nominator on his talk page.... with my having found plenty of useful sources, I took the 204 characters stub first nominated and turned it into a decent 3078 characters start class article... an easy 15x expansion. Had WP:BEFORE been used and WP:NRVE followed, I do not think this AFD would have been created in the first place. That being said, and even with AFD not intended to force improvements, notability is now a lock. DYK anyone? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:39, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

• Keep Per the excellent work (once again) from Michael. MichaelQSchmidt - drop me a note on my talkpage as to which bit you'd like as the hook and I'll do the DYK too. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
• Keep Per excellent work from MichaelQSchmidt.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:42, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
• Keep This film article meets the notability guidelines, has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Nice work from MichaelQSchmidt. Much needed and appreciated.--Skr15081997 (talk) 13:50, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
• Keep - Excellent sourcing and article improvement by Michael Schmidt. Kudos. Arunram (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.