Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance FC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:39, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Alliance FC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see or mention "Alliance FC Brooklyn Park" anywhere else in the sources or even that Wikipedia article. I searched for the keywords but can't find relevant Google hits. This is going to be a long standing hoax that lasted for over eight years. Eyesnore 00:10, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

• Delete I'm not sure if it's a hoax, but it certainly, absolutely, completely is not a notable soccer team. Never played in the NPSL and cannot find any record of it existing. SportingFlyer talk 04:04, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 05:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

• Delete - non notable team. NZFC^(talk) 07:06, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:53, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

• Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 10:12, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication of any other achievements garnering sufficient significant, independent coverage to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 10:37, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
• Delete non notable if they do even exist. If they exist, the fact no-one can find sources about them demonstrates that they're not notable enough. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:04, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.