Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance F.C.

In this article, the topic of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance F.C. will be addressed exhaustively, analyzing its main aspects and addressing the different perspectives that exist on the matter. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance F.C. is a topic that has generated great interest both in the academic community and in society in general, due to its relevance and impact in various areas. Throughout these pages, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance F.C. will be examined from different approaches, with the aim of providing a comprehensive and enriching vision on this topic. By reviewing various sources and presenting specific cases, the reader will be provided with a broad understanding of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance F.C. and its implications today.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 17:39, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Alliance F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, NSPORTS, ORGCRIT. References in article are to stats, match results, ROUTINE sports reporting. BEFORE showed the same. Nothing that meets IS RS providing SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  16:44, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Delete - not notable. Vyvagaba (talk) 10:15, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.