Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay sanchaniya

The theme of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay sanchaniya is of utmost importance today, since it significantly impacts various aspects of our daily lives. From Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay sanchaniya, numerous debates, controversies and advances emerge, which makes it essential to deepen its study and understanding. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay sanchaniya has captured the attention of experts, academics, professionals and society in general, triggering endless research, publications and related events. In this article, we will delve into the different aspects of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay sanchaniya, exploring its implications, perspectives and challenges today.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:15, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Ajay sanchaniya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely lacking notability; was previously deleted via CSD. Re-creation is likely by the subject. Let's kill it via AfD so that any future articles can (if appropriate) be done by G4. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 13:10, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete Yeah. No independent sources in article, and lead was copied from . Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 16:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 16:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.