Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1726 Hoffmeister

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:42, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

1726 Hoffmeister (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Possibly worth redirecting to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Boleyn (talk) 11:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:46, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NASTCRIT, without prejudice against redirection. Tigraan (talk) 09:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
• Keep. Searching finds multiple reliable sources describing this asteroid specifically. -- 120.17.67.220 (talk) 02:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Could you list them, then? Tigraan (talk) 08:36, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

• Weak Keep – The largest member of the small Hoffmeister family, per Migliorini et al (1996). Praemonitus (talk) 19:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

• Keep The asteroid is the subject of specific research papers. Andrew D. (talk) 07:43, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
• Keep as the main object in its family. As well as the 1996 paper already listed by Praemonitus there is more research specifically about this family in . —David Eppstein (talk) 23:24, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.