User talk:Stephanie.epelly

In this article, we will explore the fascinating world of User talk:Stephanie.epelly, which has captured the attention of experts and enthusiasts alike. From its impact on contemporary society to its historical roots, User talk:Stephanie.epelly has been the subject of intense debate and analysis. Throughout these pages, we will examine the different aspects of User talk:Stephanie.epelly, from its influence on popular culture to its relevance in academia. Through this journey, we hope to offer a complete and nuanced view of User talk:Stephanie.epelly, giving our readers a deeper understanding of this fascinating topic.

Bottazzi

Sorry for the deletion of Bottazzi's current living location.

The article looked like an advertisement one... I reduced all the endless list and everything was not WP:NPOV (Not point of view), WP:Weasel word etc. At the end, there were nothing remained referred to.--'''Attilios''' (talk) 07:41, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Attilios

Sorry about 'referred to', I am not so used to discuss. I was not speaking about current living location, but about "Some examples of site-specifics art works realized recently". You deleted everything! - referred to. --8:09, 8 October 2011‎ Attilios (talk | contribs)‎ (2,009 bytes) (→References: no more refs to be included now) (undo). I will try to rewrite it with only references.

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Guillaume Bottazzi may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:14, 13 October 2013 (UTC)