User talk:Skywatcher68
Welcome!
Hello, Skywatcher68, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Powers 19:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Note
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amity_University,_Noida&diff=prev&oldid=1244987981
This article (and user not fully understanding writing style) should be checked. 93.140.204.201 (talk) 11:17, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- https://en.m.wikipedia.orghttps://wikifreehand.com/en/Southorn_Playground# 93.140.204.201 (talk) 11:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. The issues at Amity University, Noida, have already been addressed but I've removed the MOS:OVERLINKING from Southorn Playground. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- https://en.m.wikipedia.orghttps://wikifreehand.com/en/Kerala_Premier_League?searchToken=2o3kbi9ka70unmkbig1ciujtc#History
- this section is sourced but very vague, deletion possible ?! 93.140.245.199 (talk) 05:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- https://en.m.wikipedia.orghttps://wikifreehand.com/en/South_Indian_Derby#Notable_matches
- this page has parts of massive personal style... Cenderabird (talk) 00:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Two sections tagged as overly detailed. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. The issues at Amity University, Noida, have already been addressed but I've removed the MOS:OVERLINKING from Southorn Playground. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Note
https://en.m.wikipedia.orghttps://wikifreehand.com/en/Liga_2_(Indonesia)
check of each club article and their grammar fix much needed, try when able; im not native, besides countless local ip's flock articles Cenderabird (talk) 10:13, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Cenderabird I'm not seeing anything obvious. Feel free to tag the article(s) with Template:Cleanup rewrite and specify your concerns in the tag. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:11, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Mossbourne IP
Hey there,
I don't *think* the Mossbourne allegations section blanking IP is a COI case - the IP traces to Rochdale, pretty much the other end of the country. The allegations have recieved a fairly large amount of coverage, my guess would be they're coming from that. That being said, we'll see how it pans out - could well turn out to be some sort of COI. CR (talk) 21:47, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- @CipherRephic Where they are is difficult to say. Three different locations from three different geolocators and their ISP has a mobile partner. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 22:45, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- True, yeah. At the end of the day it's the editing behaviour that matters - blanking the section is unjustified whether they're a school employee or someone completely removed from the subject. CR (talk) 22:49, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025! |
|
Hello Skywatcher68, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025.
Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Abishe (talk) 23:32, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Note
Can this article be cleared/checked more please:
https://en.m.wikipedia.orghttps://wikifreehand.com/en/Sports_Authority_of_India#National_coaching_camps 93.143.29.142 (talk) 18:24, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what can be done there, the entire article is already tagged as being too promotional. Perhaps an admin like @JBW: can advise? –Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- From a very quick look, the way it looks to me is as follows. Indeed there is unacceptable promotional content, although it looks as though the recent IP editing has improved it to some extent. Much of the content of the article is also unsourced. For both of those reasons, it seems to me that heavy pruning of the article would be justified. However, there's nothing there that requires an administrator: the clean up could just as well be done by you, or the IP editor, or the person who put the drive-by promotion tag and then went away and left it, or anyone else willing to put in the necessary time. JBW (talk) 19:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- @JBW I was just looking for input regarding how an ordinary editor could improve the article and you provided; thanks. Rewriting for neutrality looks to extensive for me, though. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. It's fairly easy to clean up an article with just a little promotional content, but ones with extensive promotional material can be a daunting task. That can have the unfortunate effect that the ones most in need of clean up are the ones least likely to get it. Occasionally it's possible to revert to a non-promotional version from long ago ago, but that tends to be a drastic option, as it is likely to throw out good edits along with the bad. However, it may be worth a look at the article's history to see whether that option is possible. Another possibility is to just ruthlessly remove large chunks of the article which look mostly bad, and accept possible collateral loss of good content as a cost that has to be paid. In my experience, though, that approach has more risk of just being reverted than other methods. JBW (talk) 20:03, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- https://en.m.wikipedia.orghttps://wikifreehand.com/en/National_University_of_Laos_F.C.#
- please deletion nomination, not enough sources to add content 93.140.70.119 (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Looks like the problem is that Laotian football isn't a very popular subject here. At least one other team in the same league has a proper article so maybe it's just a matter of time. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 22:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- https://en.m.wikipedia.orghttps://wikifreehand.com/en/Adam_Sherlip#
- Another to check...
- And, Laotian club got vandalised suddenly 93.140.76.18 (talk) 02:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- You did a pretty good job with Adam Sherlip. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 05:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Looks like the problem is that Laotian football isn't a very popular subject here. At least one other team in the same league has a proper article so maybe it's just a matter of time. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 22:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. It's fairly easy to clean up an article with just a little promotional content, but ones with extensive promotional material can be a daunting task. That can have the unfortunate effect that the ones most in need of clean up are the ones least likely to get it. Occasionally it's possible to revert to a non-promotional version from long ago ago, but that tends to be a drastic option, as it is likely to throw out good edits along with the bad. However, it may be worth a look at the article's history to see whether that option is possible. Another possibility is to just ruthlessly remove large chunks of the article which look mostly bad, and accept possible collateral loss of good content as a cost that has to be paid. In my experience, though, that approach has more risk of just being reverted than other methods. JBW (talk) 20:03, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- @JBW I was just looking for input regarding how an ordinary editor could improve the article and you provided; thanks. Rewriting for neutrality looks to extensive for me, though. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- From a very quick look, the way it looks to me is as follows. Indeed there is unacceptable promotional content, although it looks as though the recent IP editing has improved it to some extent. Much of the content of the article is also unsourced. For both of those reasons, it seems to me that heavy pruning of the article would be justified. However, there's nothing there that requires an administrator: the clean up could just as well be done by you, or the IP editor, or the person who put the drive-by promotion tag and then went away and left it, or anyone else willing to put in the necessary time. JBW (talk) 19:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Help Needed
Hello Skywatcher68, Need your help to stop a Wikipedia page from getting delated it is one I think you have looked at already called “The Lost Mountaineers” about a documentary someone has nominated it deletion and the we don’t know how to go about contesting this. Any assistance you might be able to give would be very much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.34.232.180 (talk) 22:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- True, I have edited that article but only for manual of style purposes; I don't really have an opinion on the subject. However, it appears that the main sticking point of the deletion discussion is a lack of notability; adding reliable sources which are about the making of the documentary rather than the events depicted therein should help. I'm only able to find sources about screenings of the film rather than the film itself. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:48, 13 January 2025 (UTC)