User talk:Ronnievonjohnson

Hello, Ronnievonjohnson, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 03:36, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Karl Worner (footballer) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karl Worner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Ronnievonjohnson! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Mikayla Western, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 08:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Sebit Kuek, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

FuzzyMagma (talk) 17:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Awesome Thank You! Ronnievonjohnson (talk) 23:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Two edit warnings for apparent "unconstructive edits to Wikipedia" what a joke all to change 2024 to 2023

Just shut up and stop editing my talk page, she left captaincy in 2024 which is what I originally wrote.

Hello, Ronnievonjohnson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karl Worner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

I saw your edits in regard to the Shire of Ravensthorpe moving to the Great Southern (Western Australia). Is it really? I know they have applied but has it really moved? The Regions | DLGSC website still lists it under Goldfields office, as does the Local Government - Goldfields-Esperance Development Commission (GEDC), while the Great Southern Development Commission - GSDC doesn't list the Shire of Ravensthorpe there. I found only one source, Ravensthorpe formally accepted into new regional WALGA zone after leaving Goldfields-Esperance | Kalgoorlie Miner, hidden behind a pay wall. Do you have a reliable source confirming this move? Not even About WALGA | WALGA seems to have anything about this move. Calistemon (talk) 08:36, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

I believe it is official, the WA Country Health Service website now lists Ravensthorpe under the Great Southern regional profile, alongside City of Albany, Shire of Broomehill-Tambellup etc,: https://www.wacountry.health.wa.gov.au/Our-services/Great-Southern/Great-Southern-regional-profile Ronnievonjohnson (talk) 08:54, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

But yeah, it's a shame that the coverage was so sparse, if you type "ravensthorpe joins great southern region" into google, that article by the Kalgoorlie Miner says "A south-coast WA shire has been formally accepted into a new regional council zone after leaving the Goldfields-Esperance local government zone. The shire of Ravensthorpe will now function as a Great Southern shire under Western Australian Local Government Association zoning." but the rest of the article is indeed hidden behind a paywall.

What surprises me more is that there is nothing on it on the shire's website either, just the note from June about the application. Official maps, like https://maps.slip.wa.gov.au/landgate/locate/ and https://nationalmap.gov.au/ still show it under Goldfields. Calistemon (talk) 09:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Pike (jockey). Thanks! Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:15, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

For all notable wins, please add sources for each and resubmit draft for review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William Pike (jockey) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 13:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

"For all notable wins, please add sources for each and resubmit draft for review" It seems a bit excessive to ask for a reference to every individual race. It certainly doesn't seem common, every jockey article I've come across would point to the contrary. All the races from the "notable wins" section are referenced in the racing profile provided in my draft. Ronnievonjohnson (talk) 14:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)