User talk:Jorjman

You made a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB90:8857:6F8B:0:49:8188:2401 (talk) 13:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Jorjman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Jorjman. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:05, 15 May 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ved Mata Gaytri Mandir— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Govinda (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article B Chandrakala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B Chandrakala (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Sanskari ^Hangout 15:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC).

Hi friend, I am during edit this article right knowledge base pls wait..Jorjman (talk) 15:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Sorry friend, I will not agree to deletion for this article. Jorjman (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Pls remove notice templet because this is correct knowledge base article , I think that we should not discussion on this article. Jorjman (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with B Chandrakala. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rajshri Productions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, re: this a quick note to edify you that the |director= parameter of the film infobox is for the film's chief director, not for assistant directors. Similarly, in the |cinematographer= parameter we only care about the primary cinematographer, not second unit cinematographers, and so forth. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Can i include assistant director name external the templet area. Jorjman (talk) 07:56, 9 April 2017 (UTC) Jorjman (talk) 07:56, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RBF Production and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, re: this, similar to my previous note to you about the purpose of the Director parameter, the |starring= parameter of the film infobox is not intended to be used to list all of the people who appear in the movie, only the people who receive the special "starring" credits. Typically, starring credits are derived from the theatrical poster's billing block. If this is not available (as is often the case in Indian cinema) then we would use the film's onscreen credits, or if that's not helpful, some established authoritative source. "Starring" does not mean "appearing in", so it's questionable that there would be 10 starring roles in this film. Please see the instructions at Template:Infobox film to get a better handle on how to use the various infobox parameters. And if you dispute my reversion, feel free to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:06, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Re: this, it's again unclear why you're adding these additional roles to |starring=. The article lead indicates two people are the "stars", which may or may not be accurate, but fleshing out |starring= to reflect 4 roles, two of which are questionable entries as "stars" isn't helpful, particularly when your changes are unexplained and unsourced. It's also unclear why you chose to get rid of the tidy wiki-friendly {{ubl}} unbulleted list formatting in favor of the less favorable clunky HTML line breaks. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 10:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, re: these changes, please see the Template:Infobox film instructions and familiarise yourself with the purpose of each parameter. Baahubali is a film that, according to sources, was filmed in both Telugu and Tamil. It's unclear why you are adding content about the Hindi dub in this article. If information about the dub is noteworthy (and that's questionable, since a ton of American films are dubbed into a variety of languages, yet those versions are not crammed prominently into film articles) then it belongs somewhere else in the article, and should be well sourced and documented as noteworthy. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:16, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Jorjman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "RBF Production".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 19:14, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Jorjman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Jorjman, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a test page. Use the sandbox for testing.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 04:13, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Your page, which is intended to be an RFA nomination, is in main space as an article entitled Jorjman. I am sure this is not what you intended. You probably wanted to develop this in a sandbox and transclude it to the RfA page. I tagged it because I thought it was a newbie mistake. I see you are an established editor but nonetheless, I think you did not intend to put this in main space. I suggest you delete my speedy deletion template and ask that page be deleted so it may be deleted as an original author request. Then you can proceed in the correct manner. I suggest you review the RfA information pages to see whether you wish to proceed with this and the proper way to do it. Donner60 (talk) 05:11, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi,Dear you are right i have wanted to create it on RfA but by mistake i create it on Artical page sorry for that and give me suggest how to delete page. (Thank you) Jorjman (talk) 05:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

You are welcome. I suggest you read Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates before you proceed with an RfA. There are also several user essays about RfA. Some are a few years old but most are not really outdated. User:Kudpung/RfA criteria is a good one. I think you will find from the information on these pages that you do not have enough experience or edits to have a successful RfA. I do not intend to be harsh or critical. I am just telling you about these pages and what they say for your information. I am only trying to advise that I think you will be disappointed if you apply for RfA now. You should make consistent contributions for at least a year without major gaps in time and also follow advice in the linked pages. Best of luck in your editing and Wikipedia participation. Donner60 (talk) 05:40, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

A Lot of Thanks Jorjman (talk) 06:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC)