In today's world,
User talk:Fastez has become increasingly relevant. Whether due to its impact on society, its historical relevance or its influence in the cultural sphere,
User talk:Fastez has become a topic of constant interest and debate. From its origins to its evolution today,
User talk:Fastez has left an indelible mark on different aspects of daily life. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the importance of
User talk:Fastez and analyze its impact in various contexts. From its origin to its transformation over time,
User talk:Fastez continues to be a topic of interest and relevance, sparking the curiosity of researchers, academics and enthusiasts alike.
Hello, رد سريع, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 23:46, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- "Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
- Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
- We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
- Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
- Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence. In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.
Ian.thomson (talk) 23:46, 24 October 2014 (UTC)